EU FP-7 project RECODE has released findings of its case studies in open access to research data

The EU FP-7 project RECODE has released findings of its case studies in open access to research data. RECODE (Policy RECommendations for Open Access to Research Data in Europe) held its final conference last week in Athens, coinciding with publication of a short booklet summarising the project findings and the following ten over-arching recommendations:

-Develop aligned and comprehensive policies for open access to research data

-Ensure appropriate funding for open access to research data

-Develop policies and initiatives that offer researchers rewards for open access to high quality data

-Identify key stakeholders and relevant networks and foster collaborative work for a sustainable ecosystem for open access to research data

-Plan for the long-term, sustainable curation and preservation of open access data

-Develop comprehensive and collaborative technical and infrastructure solutions that afford open access to and long-term preservation of high-quality research data

-Develop technical and scientific quality standards for research data

-Require the use of harmonized open licensing frameworks

-Systematically address legal and ethical issues arising from open access to research data

-Support the transition to open research data through curriculum-development and training

The RECODE publication offers more specific recommendations aimed at each of the key stakeholders it has targeted, namely research funders, research institutions, data managers, and publishers. The project recommendations were informed by five disciplinary case studies (physics, health, bioengineering, environment and archaeology). These drew comparisons across four “grand challenges”:

-stakeholders values and ecosystems

-legal and ethical concerns

-infrastructure and technology challenges, and

-institutional challenges

Case studies identified two overarching issues in the mobilisation of open access to research data; firstly a “lack of a coherent open data ecosystem”, and secondly; “lack of attention to the specificity of research practice, processes and data collections”.

Source: RECODE

Thanks for reading this article. Please comment on it and also do not forget to share it.

Related Post

covid-19, coronavirus, open access
5 Must-Reads to Understand How Open Access Can Shape Research on Covid-19

COVID-19 could kill the for-profit science publishing model. That would be a good thing. by Michael Hilrzik LA Times, March 3, 2020 “Of all the ways the current coronavirus crisis has upended commonplace routines — such as disrupting global supply chains and forcing workers to stay at home — one of the most positive is […]

Read more
november 2019, open access, must reads
Weekly Open Access Must-Reads (11-15 November 2019)

A selection of this week’s news, opinions and feature articles about open access, academia and the publishing industry.  1. Room for everyone’s talent Erkennen en waarderen in de wetenschap gaan drastisch veranderen (in Dutch) By Sicco de Knecht in Science Guide Date: 13 November 2019 Read it here in English or here in Dutch   […]

Read more
International OA week 2018: Designing Equitable Foundations for Open Knowledge

Open access has increasingly become the new norm. Countries and research funders are embracing open access. Many set targets to reach 100% open access before 2020. However, issues related to equitable sharing, diversity and inclusion is not fully addressed, according to a statement by SPARC. Open access should serve the need of all scholarly communities […]

Read more

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.